
Particularly noteworthy are the agreements that show an orientation towards the 1.5 degree target with 43% less CO2 emissions in 2030:
- The production of renewable energies is to be tripled by 2030
- The amount of nuclear power available is also to be tripled by 2030
- Energy efficiency is to be doubled by 2030 - among other things by accelerating low-carbon H2 production.
What does this mean? The international community has clearly committed to a wide range of decarbonization technologies: Renewable, Nuclear and also CCS/CCU. Blue hydrogen and CCS are explicitly mentioned in the final document, as are low-carbon fuels. This is certainly an important signal of clarity for the many investment projects underway around the world.
Above all, however, the final document announced a transition away from fossil fuels and the phasing out of "inefficient" subsidies for fossil fuels. This can certainly be seen as a success for COP President Sultan AL Jaber. This is actually the first time that the big "white elephant" of fossil fuels has been given such a clear finite perspective.
This is a hopeful sign just before Christmas. For long stretches of the conference, it was unclear whether there would be such a joint signal. It is now clear that the goals of the Paris Agreement are still valid and all countries are committed to continuing to work together towards these goals - despite very different economic and energy policy conditions.
What does this mean for our domestic industry? First of all, no concrete obligations. But the certainty that it is right to consistently continue along the path of decarbonization already taken by many and to strengthen our own transformation pathways - in the knowledge that we can only tackle climate change together and that we always need pioneers who make their contribution to achieving these goals. A breakdown in the global consensus would have had dramatic consequences for these plans.
And there is also hope that the Dubai resolutions can further reduce the existing gaps between our ambitions in Germany and those of our global competitors. And that is important: because only if we balance out the current differences in competitiveness will we be able to invest the high costs of carbon leakage protection in real innovation for a climate-neutral world - as the BDI aptly put it at the end of the conference.
Author: Kaufmann, S.